Taxbykk
Pro

Author name: kkagarwal

Request the authority to first investigate the supplier

Brief summary of the case Court: Delhi High CourtNumber: M.A.T. 1948 of 2023Petitioner: Diamond Beverages Private Limited & Anr.Respondent: The Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CX, Taltala Division II Kolkata South Commissionerate & OrsDate of decision: 15.12.2023Judges: Honourable TS. Sivagnanam Download Diamond Beverages Private Limited & Anr Vs The Assistant Commissioner of CGST & CX, […]

Request the authority to first investigate the supplier Read More »

26AS cannot be the sole basis of computation of tax

Brief summary of the case Court: Delhi High CourtNumber: SERVICE TAX APPEAL NO. 54785 OF 2023Petitioner: M/s Jamwant Pandey & SonsRespondent: Commissioner Appeal Central Goods And Service Tax And Central Excise, BhopalDate of decision: 06.03.2024Judges: Mr. Rajeev Tandon Download M/s Jamwant Pandey & Sons Vs Commissioner Appeal Central Goods And Service Tax And Central Excise,

26AS cannot be the sole basis of computation of tax Read More »

Time barred appeal can be filed if there is gross injustice

Brief summary of the case Court: Uttarakhand High CourtNumber: SPECIAL APPEAL NO. 123 OF 2022Petitioners: Vinod Kumar  Respondents: Commissioner Uttarakhand State GST and othersDate of decision: 20.06.2022Judges: Honourable Chief Justice Shri Sanjaya Kumar Mishra Download Vinod Kumar Vs Commissioner Uttarakhand State GST and others

Time barred appeal can be filed if there is gross injustice Read More »

Deposit under protest vide DRC 03 should be treated as pre deposit

Brief summary of the case Court: Bombay High CourtNumber: WRIT PETITION NO.14095 OF 2022Petitioners: Chetankumar Jasraj Palgota HUFRespondents: State of Maharashtra & OrsDate of decision: 04.12.2023Judges: Honourable G. S. Kulkarni & Honourable Jitendra Jain, J.j. Download Chetankumar Jasraj Palgota HUF Vs State of Maharashtra & Ors

Deposit under protest vide DRC 03 should be treated as pre deposit Read More »

No bunching of SCN

Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.No.33164 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.32855 of 2023Petitioner: Titan Company LtdRespondent: The Joint Commissioner of GST & Central ExciseDate of decision: 18.12.2023Judges: Hon’ble Mr.justice Krishnan Ramasamy Download Titan Company Ltd Vs The Joint Commissioner of GST & Central Excise Brief summary of the case Court: Karnataka High

No bunching of SCN Read More »

Scroll to Top