Proper officers in Madhya Pradesh
Download Proper officers in Madhya Pradesh
Penalty cannot be levied based on eye estimation of stock
Brief summary of the case Court: Allahabad High CourtPetitioners: M/S Eco Plus Steels Pvt. Ltd.Respondents: State Of U.P. And 3 OthersNumber: WRIT TAX No. – 916 of 2022Date of decision: 03.04.2024Judges: Hon’ble Shekhar B. Saraf, J. Download M/S Eco Plus Steels Pvt. Ltd Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Igst paid instead of cgst and sgst allowed rectification
Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.No.12382 of 2020Petitioner: Deepa tradersRespondent: Principal Chief Commissioner of GSTDate of decision: 09.03.2023Judges:Honourable Dr.anita Sumanth,j. Download Deepa traders Vs Principal Chief Commissioner of GST
Letting out of hostel is exempt from GST
Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.No.28486 of 2023:Petitioner: Thai Mookambikaa Ladies Hostel,Respondent: Union of IndiaDate of decision: 22.03.2024Judges: Hon’ble Krishnan Ramasamy, J. Download Thai Mookambikaa Ladies Hostel Vs Union of India
Guidelines for CGST field formations in maintaining ease ofdoing business while engaging in investigation with regular taxpayers
Download Guidelines for CGST field formations in maintaining ease ofdoing business while engaging in investigation with regulartaxpayers
3700 crore GST penalty on employees S 122(1A) and S 137
Brief summary of the case Court: Bombay High CourtNumber: WWRIT PETITION (L) NO. 30198 OF 2023Petitioner: Shantanu Sanjay HundekariRespondent: Union of indiaDate of decision: 28.03.2024Judges: Hon’ble Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, J and G.S. Kulkarni, J Download Shantanu Sanjay Hundekari Vs Union of india
State Tax Authorities do not have power to adjudicate place of supply
Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.No.34792 of 2019Petitioner: Tvl.Vardhan InfraastructreRespondent: The Special SecretaryDate of decision: 15.09.2023Judges: Honourable C.Saravan.J Download Tvl.Vardhan Infraastructre Vs The Special Secretary
Refund allowed to recipient if supplier has paid the tax
Brief summary of the case Court: Delhi High CourtNumber: W.P.(C) 1039/2024Petitioner: Pedersen Consultants India Pvt LtdRespondent: Union of India Date of decision: 19.03.2024Judges: Honourable Sanjeev Sachdeva, J and Mr.Ravinder Dudeja, J Download Pedersen Consultants India Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India
Guidelines for conducting investigation in certain cases
Download Guidelines for conducting investigation in certain cases
DSC affixation In the Taxpayer communications issued by the Tax Officer
Download DSC affixation In the Taxpayer communications issued by the Tax Officer
