Taxbykk
Pro

Taxing construction services and not JDA

Brief summary of the case Court: Patna High CourtNumber: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6700 of 2024Petitioner: Shashi Ranjan Constructions Private LimitedRespondent: Union of India through the SecretaryDate of decision: 05.05.2025Judges: Honourable Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J Vs Ashok Kumar Pandey, J Download Shashi Ranjan Constructions Private Limited Vs Union of India through the Secretary

Taxing construction services and not JDA Read More »

20_4 Rule 86A is draconian therefore warrants pre decision hearing

Brief summary of the case Court: Supreme Court of IndiaNumber: SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No.11543/2025Petitioner: The State Of Karnataka & AnrRespondent: K-9 EnterprisesDate of decision: 02.04.2024Judges: Honourable S.r. Krishna Kumar & G Basavaraja Download The State Of Karnataka & Anr vs K-9 Enterprises

20_4 Rule 86A is draconian therefore warrants pre decision hearing Read More »

GST- AT Rules 2025

GST- AT Rules 2025 GSTAT’s Role in Shaping GST Litigation: Procedures and Monetary Limits | APL-05 to Tribunal Orders Navigating GSTAT Appeals: A Guide to the New Procedural Rules (2025) | Filing Appeals with GSTAT GSTAT’s New Rules: Clarifying Fees, Certified Copies, and Procedural Hurdles | Preparing for GSTAT Strategic Considerations in GSTAT Appeals: Cross-Objections,

GST- AT Rules 2025 Read More »

In exceptional circumstances sez can claim refund

Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.Nos.26164 and 26166 of 2021Petitioner: Urjita Electronics Private LimitedRespondent: The Joint Commissioner of GST and Central ExciseDate of decision: 02.01.2024Judges: Hon’ble C.Saravanan, J. Download Urjita Electronics Private Limited Vs The Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise

In exceptional circumstances sez can claim refund Read More »

Interim relief on compensation cess for Tobacco Exports only if recommended by gst council

Brief summary of the case Court: Gujarat High CourtNumber: R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6701 of 2023Petitioner: M/s. Sopariwala Export Pvt. Ltd.Respondent: Joint Commissioner, Cgst And Central Excise & OrsDate of decision: 09.05.2025Judges: Honourable Mr. Justice Bhargav D. Karia And Honourable Mr.justice D.n.ray Download M/s. Sopariwala Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs Joint Commissioner, Cgst And Central Excise

Interim relief on compensation cess for Tobacco Exports only if recommended by gst council Read More »

Challenge to scn writ not entertained since there is no violation of principles of natural justice and no vice to law

Brief summary of the case Court: Himachal High CourtNumber: CWP No. 9239 of 2024Petitioner: M/s Himalaya Wellness CompanyRespondent: Union of India & Ors.Date of decision: 05.05.2025Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. & The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Download M/s Himalaya Wellness Company Vs Union of India & Ors.

Challenge to scn writ not entertained since there is no violation of principles of natural justice and no vice to law Read More »

No retro penalty under section 122(1A) which came into effect from 01.01.2021

Brief summary of the case Court: Bombay High CourtNumber: WRIT PETITION NO.5001 OF 2025Petitioner: Mr.Amit Manilal Haria & Ors..Respondent: The Joint Commissioner of CGST & CE & OrsDate of decision: 16.04.2025Judges: The Honourable Firdosh P. Pooniwalla, J & B. P. Colabawalla, J Download Mr.Amit Manilal Haria & Ors. Vs The Joint Commissioner of CGST &

No retro penalty under section 122(1A) which came into effect from 01.01.2021 Read More »

GST demand dropped due to procedural lapses since no independent witness present at the time of search and seizure

Brief summary of the case Court: Patna High CourtNumber: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13674 of 2024Petitioner: M/s Sri Sai Food Grain and Iron StorsRespondent: The State of Bihar through The Principal SecretaryDate of decision: 25.04.2025Judges: Honourable Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri and Honourable Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha Download M/s Sri Sai Food Grain and

GST demand dropped due to procedural lapses since no independent witness present at the time of search and seizure Read More »

Scroll to Top