Taxbykk
Pro

March 7, 2023

Copy paste reasons to believe not allowed

Brief summary of the case Court: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHINumber: W.P.(c) 4847/2021Petitioner: M/s R.J. Trading Co.Respondent: Commissioner of Cgst Delhi North Ors.Date of decision: 20.07.2021Judges: Honourable Mr.Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Mr.Justice Talwant Singh Download M/s R.J. Trading Co.Vs Commissioner of Cgst Delhi North Ors.

GST Officials Cannot Use Physical Violence

Brief summary of the case Court: Telangana High CourtNumber: WP 28268/2019Petitioner: Agarwal Foundries Private Limited Rama TowersRespondent: Union of IndiaDate of decision: 06.11.2020Judges: The Honourable Sri justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao and Sri Justice T.Amarnath Goud Download Agarwal Foundries Private Limited Rama Towers Vs UOI GST Case

Cash can be seized u/s 67

Brief summary of the case Court: HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORENumber: Writ Petition No.8204/2020Petitioner: Kanishka MattaRespondent: Union of IndiaDate of decision: 26.08.2020Judges: Honourable Mr.Justice S.C.Sharma and Mr.Justice Shailendra Shukla Download Kanishka Matta Vs UOI GST Case

Conclude investigation in 3 months

Brief summary of the case Court: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHINumber: W.P. (C) 3618/2020Petitioner: Watermelon Management Services pvt.ltdRespondent: Watermelon Management Services pvt.ltdDate of decision: 29.06.2020Judges: Honourable Mr.Justice Manmohan and Mr.Justice Sanjeev Narula Download Watermelon Management Services pvt.ltd Vs The Commissioner Central TAX GST Case

The period of 30 days cannot be extended as given in Section 62 Best Judgement Assessment

Brief summary of the case Court: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMNumber: WP(C).No.25066 of 2019(G)Petitioner: Ms Bridge Hygiene Services Private LimitedRespondent: The State Tax OfficerDate of decision: 23.09.2019Judges: Honourable Justice.A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar Download Ms Bridge Hygiene Services Private Limited Vs The State Tax Officer GST Case

Notice to taxpayer should be clear enough

Brief summary of the case Court: All High Courts Andhra Pradesh Number: W.P. No. 36673 of 2022Petitioner: M/s S.A. TradersRespondent: The GST Officer, The Chief Commissioner of State Tax, State of Andhra PradeshDate of decision: 16.11.2022Judges: Honourable Sri Justice U.Durga Prasad Rao and Sri Justice T.Mallikarjuna Rao Download M/s S.A. Traders Vs. The GST Officer, …

Notice to taxpayer should be clear enough Read More »

Parallel GST Proceedings not Allowed

Brief summary of the case Court: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT CALCUTTANumber: M.A.T. No.1595 of 2022Petitioner: M/s. R. P. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.Respondent: The Superintendent, CGST & CX, Circle – II, Group – 10 & ors.Date of decision: 30.09.2022Judges: Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.Sivagnanam and Mr.Justice Supratim Bhattacharya Download M/s. R. P. Buildcon Pvt. …

Parallel GST Proceedings not Allowed Read More »

SCN reply time cannot be reduced

Brief summary of the case Court: IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNumber: Writ Pettion (l) No.17591 of 2022Petitioner: Sheetal Dilip JainRespondent: State of Maharashtra OrsDate of decision: 20.09.2022Judges: Honourable K.R.Sriram and A.S.Doctor.JJ Download Sheetal Dilip Jain Vs State of Maharashtra Ors GST Case

S R Cold Storage vs UOI

Brief summary of the case Court: High Courts AllahabadNumber: Writ TAX No. – 723 of 2022Petitioner: S R Cold StorageRespondent: Union of India Date of decision: 11.08.2022Judges: Honourable Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. and Jayant Banerji,J. Download S R Cold Storage vs UOI GST Case

Scroll to Top