Taxbykk
Pro

Author name: kkagarwal

kktaxsir

ASMT 10 mandatory to form an opinion for issuance of SCN

Brief summary of the case – Case No. : WP(C)/6960/2023 Court: Gauhati High CourtNumber: Case No. : WP(C)/6960/2023Petitioner: M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. LtdRespondent: The Union Of India And 3 OrsDate of decision: 13.12.2023 Download M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd Vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors Watch analytical discussion of Latest High

ASMT 10 mandatory to form an opinion for issuance of SCN Read More »

S 16(4) of CGST Act is constitutionally valid

Brief summary of the case – MAT NO. 1099 OF 2023 Court: Calcutta High CourtNumber: MAT NO. 1099 OF 2023Petitioner: M/s. Bba Infrastructure Limited    Respondent: Senior Joint Commissioner Of State Tax And OthersDate of decision: 13.12.2023Judges: Hon’ble t.s. sivagnanam, cj and Hon’ble Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J Download M/s. Bba Infrastructure Limited Vs Senior Joint Commissioner Of State

S 16(4) of CGST Act is constitutionally valid Read More »

Notices and orders should be visible in Additional Notices and Orders

Brief summary of the case Court: Madras High CourtNumber: W.P.No.26457 of 2023Petitioner: M/s.East Coast Constructions and Industries LimitedRespondent: Assistant Commissioner (ST)Date of decision: 02.12.2020Judges: Honourable C.saravanan, J. Download M/s.Sabari Infra Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)

Notices and orders should be visible in Additional Notices and Orders Read More »

Concession in late fees has retrospective effect otherwise it violates Article 14

Brief summary of the case Court: Allahabad High CourtNumber: WRIT TAX No. – 1192 of 2023Petitioner: M/S Modern Steel Respondent: Additional Commissioner And AnotherDate of decision: 19.10.2023Judges: Hon’ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. Download M/S Modern Steel Vs Additional Commissioner And Another

Concession in late fees has retrospective effect otherwise it violates Article 14 Read More »

Unsigned order is invalid order | It was also held that an unsigned order is not an order in the eyes of law. Rule 26(3)Unsigned order is invalid order | Unsigned gst orders invalid. case remanded back

Brief summary of the case Court: Andhra Pradesh High CourtNumber: WRIT PETITION No. 29397 of 2023Petitioner: M/s. SRK EnterprisesRespondent: Assistant Commissioner (ST),Date of decision: 10.11.2023Judges: Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari And Hon’ble Sri Justice A. V. Ravindra Babu Download M/s. SRK Enterprises Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST), Brief summary of the case Court: Bombay High

Unsigned order is invalid order | It was also held that an unsigned order is not an order in the eyes of law. Rule 26(3)Unsigned order is invalid order | Unsigned gst orders invalid. case remanded back Read More »

Concession in late fees has retrospective effect otherwise it violates Article 14

Brief summary of the case Court: Kerala High CourtNumber: WP(C) NO. 32069 OF 2023Petitioner: Saloom TradingRespondent: The Superintendent, Central Goods And Services TaxDate of decision: 22.11.2023Judges: Hon’ble Dinesh Kumar Singh Download Saloom Trading Vs The Superintendent, Central Goods And Services Tax

Concession in late fees has retrospective effect otherwise it violates Article 14 Read More »

Shopping cart0
There are no products in the cart!
You may be interested in…
Gst notifications (3)
Original price was: ₹1,000.00.Current price is: ₹699.00.
1777899845
Original price was: ₹1,500.00.Current price is: ₹599.00.
Screenshot 2026 03 20 115146
Original price was: ₹3,800.00.Current price is: ₹2,999.00.
Gst litigation1235
Original price was: ₹1,500.00.Current price is: ₹799.00.
GST Premium Discussion Club - 31st Dec 2026
GST Premium Discussion Club - 31st Dec 2026
7,999.00
GST Litigation Course on YouTube - By CS KK Agrawal - GST EXPERT
GST Litigation Course on YouTube - By CS KK Agrawal - GST EXPERT
Continue shopping
0
Scroll to Top